<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visual Studio 2008 SP1 and .NET 3.5 SP1 released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikewilson.cc/2008/08/12/visual-studio-2008-sp1-and-net-35-sp1-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikewilson.cc/2008/08/12/visual-studio-2008-sp1-and-net-35-sp1-released/</link>
	<description>Busy Dad, Software Developer &#38; Business Owner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Client-only Framework subset: Thank you Microsoft!</title>
		<link>http://www.mikewilson.cc/2008/08/12/visual-studio-2008-sp1-and-net-35-sp1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Client-only Framework subset: Thank you Microsoft!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evolvedsoftwarestudios.com/2008/08/12/visual-studio-2008-sp1-and-net-35-sp1-released/#comment-587</guid>
		<description>[...] I posted about the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 and talked about the big 231 MB download that was seriously putting me off developing for the .NET [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I posted about the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 and talked about the big 231 MB download that was seriously putting me off developing for the .NET [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Client-only Framework subset: Thank you Microsoft! &#124; The Evolved ISV</title>
		<link>http://www.mikewilson.cc/2008/08/12/visual-studio-2008-sp1-and-net-35-sp1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Client-only Framework subset: Thank you Microsoft! &#124; The Evolved ISV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evolvedsoftwarestudios.com/2008/08/12/visual-studio-2008-sp1-and-net-35-sp1-released/#comment-283</guid>
		<description>[...] I posted about the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 and talked about the big 231 MB download that was seriously putting me off developing for the .NET [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I posted about the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 and talked about the big 231 MB download that was seriously putting me off developing for the .NET [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mikewilson.cc/2008/08/12/visual-studio-2008-sp1-and-net-35-sp1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evolvedsoftwarestudios.com/2008/08/12/visual-studio-2008-sp1-and-net-35-sp1-released/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

Have you heard of MIchael Lehman (spelling?), a technical evangelist from Microsoft to Micro-ISV&#039;s?

I, along with some other .NET developers posed him &quot;the big question&quot; a couple of years ago. Why doesn&#039;t Microsoft push the framework out to end users via automatic update?

I believe he put effort into finding an answer but was either unsuccessful or the answer wouldn&#039;t tie in with his message. As far as I am aware (and I follow this closely) there was no response on why the .NET framework had such a low take-up rate amongst end-users desktop machines. I suspect political reasons may be halting the framework updates and this is yet more evidence that Microsoft developers are synonymous with &quot;Enterprise platform&quot; developers; rather than innovative &quot;micro&quot; style ISV or open source developers.

Michael Lehman (sp?). also ran a hugely brilliant podcast with Bob Walsh, &quot;The Micro ISV Show&quot; on Channel 9. It hasn&#039;t been updated in a long while but the show archives are still there and the interviews with software developers on their businesses are excellent and thought provoking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>Have you heard of MIchael Lehman (spelling?), a technical evangelist from Microsoft to Micro-ISV&#8217;s?</p>
<p>I, along with some other .NET developers posed him &#8220;the big question&#8221; a couple of years ago. Why doesn&#8217;t Microsoft push the framework out to end users via automatic update?</p>
<p>I believe he put effort into finding an answer but was either unsuccessful or the answer wouldn&#8217;t tie in with his message. As far as I am aware (and I follow this closely) there was no response on why the .NET framework had such a low take-up rate amongst end-users desktop machines. I suspect political reasons may be halting the framework updates and this is yet more evidence that Microsoft developers are synonymous with &#8220;Enterprise platform&#8221; developers; rather than innovative &#8220;micro&#8221; style ISV or open source developers.</p>
<p>Michael Lehman (sp?). also ran a hugely brilliant podcast with Bob Walsh, &#8220;The Micro ISV Show&#8221; on Channel 9. It hasn&#8217;t been updated in a long while but the show archives are still there and the interviews with software developers on their businesses are excellent and thought provoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kane</title>
		<link>http://www.mikewilson.cc/2008/08/12/visual-studio-2008-sp1-and-net-35-sp1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evolvedsoftwarestudios.com/2008/08/12/visual-studio-2008-sp1-and-net-35-sp1-released/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>G&#039;day Mike,

As you know I still develop for Win32 being a confirmed Delphi nut.  But having said that I&#039;m very interested in what&#039;s happening with .net (especially seeing the architect was also the architect of Delphi, C# is very much like Object Pascal).  I&#039;m also looking serioulsy at Oxygene (formerly Chrome) which is a .Net Object Pascal that uses the MS VisualStudio as the IDE.  It&#039;s a little immature right now, IMHO, but it&#039;s pretty easy to port most of my code over to it (though not my VCL collection which is a huge PITA for me).  Given the uncertainty of the CodeGear sale to Embarcado it&#039;s likely such a move will become invevitabe (sad to say as I&#039;m not happy with what I&#039;m seeing over there at the moment *at all*).  So any news on .Net and it&#039;s installed base is always welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;day Mike,</p>
<p>As you know I still develop for Win32 being a confirmed Delphi nut.  But having said that I&#8217;m very interested in what&#8217;s happening with .net (especially seeing the architect was also the architect of Delphi, C# is very much like Object Pascal).  I&#8217;m also looking serioulsy at Oxygene (formerly Chrome) which is a .Net Object Pascal that uses the MS VisualStudio as the IDE.  It&#8217;s a little immature right now, IMHO, but it&#8217;s pretty easy to port most of my code over to it (though not my VCL collection which is a huge PITA for me).  Given the uncertainty of the CodeGear sale to Embarcado it&#8217;s likely such a move will become invevitabe (sad to say as I&#8217;m not happy with what I&#8217;m seeing over there at the moment *at all*).  So any news on .Net and it&#8217;s installed base is always welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

